|
Water
Tap Often Shut to South Africa Poor
May
29, 2003
By GINGER THOMPSON
SHAKASHEAD,
South Africa - The afternoon's end brings a rural rush hour
of women walking down the dirt road that winds through this
village. Many of them barefoot and dressed in rags, the mothers
and grandmothers come pushing wheelbarrows or carrying big buckets
to fetch water for their families.
But
the road quickly becomes a divide between the haves and have-nots.
Those with pennies to spend stand in line on one side and buy
their water from a metered tap.
The
larger group scoops water from a giant, littered mud puddle
across the way. Sewage seeps in from leaky pipes nearby. Some
of the women said that cholera had stricken
their families. Workers at a mobile clinic have reported high
rates of diarrhea among children here.
"I
know it is not good to take water from this hole," said
Nolulama Makhiwa, a 27-year-old mother of two. "But I am
not working. I have no money. What else can I do?"
Not
long after the country's first democratic government came to
power in 1994, putting an end to white minority rule, the new
government enshrined the right to "sufficient food and
water" in its Constitution, and pledged to make water and
sanitation available to every citizen by the end
of 2010.
At
the same time, the government also began to shift more of the
financial burden of those promises to a population in which
at least one-third of people live on less than $2 a day.
Officials
urged municipal water utilities to adopt "cost recovery"
policies that require them at least to break even, if not turn
a profit.
Municipalities
have begun working to turn debt-ridden and inefficient water
utilities into profitable operations that could attract private
investment. A handful have already granted long-term management
concessions to private multinationals.
Advocates
argue that such policies have become conventional wisdom, helping
governments around the world make ends meet while encouraging
conservation. Not only here in South
Africa, however, but also in other developing countries like
Bolivia, Ecuador and Argentina, privatization and water pricing
have met strong resistance and public protests.
"Privatization
is a new kind of apartheid," said Richard Makolo, leader
of the Crisis Water Committee, which was formed to resist the
privatization effort in a township called Orange Farm, 25 miles
south of Johannesburg. "Apartheid separated whites from
blacks. Privatization separates the rich from the poor."
South
African officials say the change in policies has helped expand
water services to 8 million of 13 million people who did not
have water when apartheid ended. But the statistics have not
added up to progress in many poor communities, which have won
their first reliable water services but now struggle to pay
for them.
The
issue of access to services has become an explosive new cause
in the same urban townships and rural squatter camps that were
principal battlegrounds in the fight against
apartheid. During the World Summit on Sustainable Development
last August, thousands marched from the tin shacks of Alexandra
past the elegant mansions of Sandton to protest, among other
things, water and electricity cutoffs and evictions. Their cry:
"Water for the thirsty. Light for the people. Homes for
the homeless."
Leaders
in sprawling townships including Soweto, Alexandra and Orange
Farm have encouraged people not to pay electricity and water
bills. They have organized teams of
bootleg plumbers and electricians to reconnect utilities when
they are cut off. Political rallies and demonstrations have
turned into street fights.
The
highest costs to poor communities have come in the form of disease
and mass disconnections. Three years ago, this province on the
northeast coast was the center of the
country's worst cholera epidemic in recent history, with 120,000
reported cases and nearly 260 deaths. The epidemic spread to
seven of the country's nine provinces.
Small
outbreaks continue to occur, as those who cannot afford to pay
for water in advance from communal meters or have been cut off
from services for not paying rising water
bills are forced to seek sources in polluted puddles, rivers
and canals that carry disease.
Here
in Shakashead, the women, speaking in their native Zulu, explained
that only the luckiest among them have jobs at all, in the emerald
sugar cane fields that surround their village.
Those
who work, they said, earn less than $45 a month, not always
enough to cover the costs of food and water.
"There
is good water here, but you must pay for it," Ms. Makhiwa
said. "If you can see the way we live, you can see that
we cannot pay."
A
survey by the government's Human Sciences Research Council for
the independent Municipal Services Project found that up to
10 million people have been affected by water cutoffs since
the end of white-minority rule.
David
McDonald, co-director of the Municipal Services Project, said
the government's own reports have portrayed a "crisis of
serious proportions." One report, he said, indicated that
some 700,000 people were affected by water cutoffs in just the
final months of 2001.
Meanwhile,
he said, surveys showed some 1.3 million people had their electricity
cut off, including some 20,000 customers each month in Soweto.
In
a telephone interview and e-mail exchanges, a high-level water
official rebutted the water cutoff estimates, saying they were
"based on a deliberate distortion of very limited survey
information."
Mr.
McDonald countered: "As far as I'm concerned, you can cut
our estimates of water cutoffs in half. The figures are still
a serious indictment of post-apartheid cost recovery policies."
In
the months following the cholera outbreaks, national water officials
started a campaign urging municipalities to provide all households
with at least a minimal "lifeline" of free water -
some 1,500 gallons a month. Mike Muller, director general of
the water department, said that an estimated 76 percent of municipalities
had committed to the effort.
"We
have had to confront the fact that in a very unequal society
like South Africa, a policy of cost recovery, which makes perfect
sense in a more equitable society, would exclude the poor from
access to that basic commodity, to which they have a right,"
he said in an interview with the South African press.
But
David Hemson, of the Human Services Research Council, said free
water still had not been provided to millions living in shantytowns
and rural areas who were most at risk for water-borne diseases,
like the residents of Shakashead, where no free water was available.
Even in communities where a "lifeline" service is
provided, water taps are set to dispense a limited amount of
water and are then shut down. In others, drip devices have been
installed, literally dispensing water one drop at a time.
"The
real battle for everyone to understand is how much does it cost
to provide water to a nation and how do we pay for it,"
Mr. Muller said. "This is not privatizing, it is a massive
reorganization of a government and how it provides services.
We are still working it out."
The
KwaDukuza municipality that covers Shakashead, with a population
of about 60,000 people that is expected to expand rapidly in
the next decade, became the first to sign a long-term management
concession with a private company.
The
agreement, signed in 1999, gave French-based Saur a 25-year
control over management of the water utility.
Three
years ago, Johannesburg Water signed a more limited management
contract with the France-based conglomerate Suez.
Among
the newest efforts by Johannesburg Water has been the installation
of prepaid water meters in townships around the country's business
capital. The first prepaid meters were installed last year in
Orange Farm, and led to the formation of the Orange Farm Crisis
Water Committee, the group headed by Mr. Makolo.
Under
the prepaid system, to begin next month and to be expanded to
other Johannesburg townships in the next couple of years, families
will only get as much water as they can pay for in advance.
Their payments will be recorded on digital discs, about as big
as a quarter. The disc fits inside the water meter, and activates
the taps.
Jean-Pierre
Mas, the operations executive at Johannesburg Water, said prepay
meters would allow customers to use only the amount of water
they could afford, and help the utility avoid clashes over cutoffs.
"Under
the old system, people were billed for far less water than they
consumed, and still they were not paying their bills,"
Mr. Mas said. "They had no incentive to lower their consumption.
They had no incentives to pay. If we don't do anything about
it, it will be an unsustainable
setup. We will have a financial disaster."
On
the dirt streets of Orange Farm, where state-of-the-art water
meters have been installed in front of lopsided tin shacks,
people foresee a human disaster. Because of its location, it
is known as the "deep south." However, it seems a
fitting nickname in other ways.
The
township has become a microcosm of the nation's most pressing
social problems, including high rates of unemployment, violent
crime and H.I.V.-infections.
Officials
at Johannesburg Water acknowledged that in communities like
these, billing people for water has been like squeezing water
from a stone. In addition to the limited resources, a culture
of nonpayment lingers from the years when people refused to
pay utility bills, usually a
flat fee for water and electricity, in support of boycotts against
the apartheid regime.
"The
problem is not that we do not want to pay for water," said
Hilda Mkwanza, a 45-year-old mother of six who lives in Orange
Farm. "The problem is we cannot pay."
Interviews
with her and other Orange Farm women, who live by doing other
people's laundry, said they barely had enough money to pay for
food and school fees. Many of them already have prepaid electricity
meters in their homes, and they say their families end up in
the dark for several days each month.
Mr.
Makolo, a veteran of the anti-apartheid movement, urges people
not to pay. His motto, he said, is "destroy the meters
and enjoy the water."
"The
government promised us that water is a basic right," he
said. "But now they are telling us our rights are for sale."
|